Yes. In fact, many of the “alternatives” are actually within the context of the litigation process. For instance, if you believe you have been wronged, your attorney can simply send a demand letter under a specific statute to demand payment or relief or the parties can simply conduct informal negotiations and attempt to come to a mutually beneficial resolution.
Otherwise, there are other avenues of getting relief without going through the lengthy and costly litigation process, i.e., mediation or arbitration.
Mediation
Mediation is the process where a third-party mediator (not affiliated with any of the parties) and simply conducts a conference with the disputing parties to assist in the reaching of an agreement. If the parties come to an agreement during the mediation process, a settlement agreement is usually drafted and signed by the parties, thereby creating a contract. There is no judgment or ruling involved, as the mediator is a neutral third-party simply there to conduct the conference and to ensure each party has the opportunity to present their offer(s) to the other party.
Arbitration
Arbitration is a process that is similar to mediation in the sense that it is done outside of court. Arbitration usually consists of a panel of neutral third parties that listen to each party’s side of the case and render a decision, similar to a panel of judges. However, the decision that the panelists make is binding. Arbitration usually arises in contract disputes where the contract states that the method of dispute resolution is to be arbitration. However, arbitration is a method of alternative dispute resolution that is available to all. The costs are lower and the process is meant to be shorter compared to full-blown litigation.